From cult: H. Brian Haney attacking Scientology through Martin Ottmann

H. Brian Haney attacking Scientology through Martin Ottmann
2 Jan 2003

Sleeping Vayu - Vayu Anonymous Remailer <noreply@cyberjunkiez.de>

Do you think it is a secret that H. Brian Haney has paid you more than $100,000 to carry on the "research" into Scientology that resulted in this "complaint"? Ask Brian Haney whether a subpoena on one of his banks would prove this along with a deposition under penalty of perjury.

While Martin Ottmann may feel safe in France from Scientology, Brian Haney is very, very, vulnerable. Brian Haney is stirring up NOTE: Any hypertext links to other documents contained within this web page were added by Fredric L. Rice.

trouble using Martin Ottmann and he should be sure he can handle what he will bring up himself for violating his settlement agreement.

As far as your "complaint" Martin Ottmann, here is a free legal clue.

Like fire needing fuel, heat, and oxygen a legal complaint should have three distinct elements covered: the law, the facts, and a conclusion.

If you don't have a law (and an Assistant U.S. Attorney or Judge will decide what law, if any, applies) then you have an insufficient complaint.

If you don't have the facts (which is determined by *admissible* evidence, not some crap you got out of a newspaper or off the Internet, then you have an insufficient complaint.

Finally, if you don't have conclusions or showing how the law applies to the facts to conclude a law has been broken, then you have a complaint that falls into disjointed pieces, impossible for any attorney or judge to use.

In the case of your "complaints" you have mostly conclusions rather than facts or even the law. Lawyers call this kind of writing "conclusory." It is a variation on the fallacy of begging the question or assuming what you are setting out to prove. It is crap it is kooky. One step above black helicopters warnings.

If a Rice brother thinks it's gold then he could prove he is something other than a windbag by actually starting a racketeering lawsuit against Scientology. Rice is content though to screw other people such as Keith Henson in the GPS episode at Gold Base or brag about secret knowledge that will bring Scientology to its knees. Secret knowledge that never seems to see the light of public scrutiny.

I think the Rice brothers are what you would get in mating Phil Scott with Tory Christman ("Magoo" if you recognize her trying to hold on to the football glory of her dad, glory she could never get for herself.) Phil Scott knows he deserves to stay in the nut house and Tory knows she is a 10-watt bulb.

Martin Ottmann, you should have spent some of those dollars that Brian Haney may have to shell out big time once again to ask for a few hours of actual legal advice.

I see Tom Padgett is adding his two cents. Maybe he should disclose who is the major benefactor in the "charity" groups he is associated with. That's right: H. Brian Haney. Soon to be a very sorry Brian Haney for associating with such losers such as Martin Ottmann and Tom Padgett instead of taking care of his own business.

The name "Scientology"® is trademarked to the Scientology organized crime syndicate. Neither this web page, nor this web site, nor any of the individuals mentioned herein assisting to educate the public about the dangers of the Scientology criminal enterprise are members of or representitives of the Scientology organization.

The use of any trademarks which may appear within this web page conforms to U. S. Title 15, section 1125, subsection (c). The use of any quoted text which may appear within this web page conforms to U. S. Code Title 17 "Fair Use" dictates. If you don't agree, send e-mail to Fred Rice with a specific complaint -- with my thanks.

Trademark usage at the Martin Ottmann Documents web site

Return to the Martin Ottmann Documents main Index page.
Click HERE for more information about the Scientology crime syndicate