Commentary, background: Federal Complaint II - Introduction

---

Martin Ottman Documents

NOTE: Any hypertext links to other documents contained within this web page were added by Fredric L. Rice.



Federal Complaint II - Introduction
1 Jan 2003

(Martin Ottmann)

Rebecca Hartong <rhartong@cox.net> wrote in message news:<BA38F57E.1185B%rhartong@cox.net>...

>> One would think Martin would have looked into this before going to such
>> effort, so I hope he can answer that question. It might be an unresolved
>> question and it might be that the issue has come up before and been decided.
>> I wouldn't think it would really matter who provided information of criminal
>> activity except insofar as it might determine how much weight the agency
>> would give it.

> That sounds about right to me, too, but we both know how the infinite wisdom
> of our government sometime manifests itself... ;-)

>> If Martin doesn't know, I might look into it further if it seems important.

> I wonder what the usual follow-up procedure is on these kinds of things.
> Does the agency receiving the complaint have any legal obligation to
> respond--even if it's only to say "we're not interested"? If there's an
> obligation, does it only apply to complaints from citizens?

> (I don't expect you to know the answers to these questions...just asking
> rhetorically.)

In December 2001 I went to the US Attorney's Office in Los Angeles. There was a reception area. I asked the lady at the desk if it was possible to report someone directly to an US Attorney if one believes someone is involved in a federal crime. She said that I could file a "Citizen Complaint" and handed me a form to filled out.

I asked her if I could file it even if I were German and would not live in Los Angeles. I think she then asked somebody else and answered me back that I could indeed.

The fact that both offices (in Los Angeles and Tampa) actually acted upon it and forwarded it both independently to the IRS makes it clear too, that it is possible to file it, even as a non-resident and non-US citizen. The form also did not exlude non-residents or non-US citizens.

The good thing about the LA and the Tampa office is that their policy requires to give the "citizen" an answer if the complaint has been forwarded or not.

---

The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

The name "Scientology"® is trademarked to the Scientology organized crime syndicate. Neither this web page, nor this web site, nor any of the individuals mentioned herein assisting to educate the public about the dangers of the Scientology criminal enterprise are members of or representitives of the Scientology organization.

The use of any trademarks which may appear within this web page conforms to U. S. Title 15, section 1125, subsection (c). The use of any quoted text which may appear within this web page conforms to U. S. Code Title 17 "Fair Use" dictates. If you don't agree, send e-mail to Fred Rice with a specific complaint -- with my thanks.

Trademark usage at the Martin Ottmann Documents web site

Return to the Martin Ottmann Documents main Index page.
Click HERE for more information about the Scientology crime syndicate

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice, The Skeptic Tank